First Look Trailer For ‘Fall Of The Republic’

August 25, 2009

Here is a first glimpse of Alex Jones’ most powerful film yet, to be titled ‘Fall of the Republic: The Presidency of Barack Obama.’ The globalists want the Republic to fall, and they are trying to use their newest, and slickest ever puppet to destroy the last vestiges of America’s freedom, Constitution and economy, all while helping the bankers loot the country clean. But this film shows how we can turn it around, and restore all that was good and right in our nation.


Al Gore says “Climate Change is Like the Nazis”

July 8, 2009
The Times Online published a story a couple  of days ago with the headline “Al Gore likens fight against climate change to battle with Nazis”. I guess that didn’t sit very well with some readers, because the Times Online changed it to read “Al Gore invokes spirit of Churchill in battle against climate change”

If you missed it, check this out.

Here’s a couple screens shots. the first one is of the original headline
Original Headline

Original Headline

The second screen shot is of the new headline while showing the page source code. If you enlarge the photo you can see in the code that they named the video “Al Gore likens fight against climate change to battle with Nazis”
Gore_Nazis

Click To Enlarge

Gore was Speaking in Oxford at the Smith School World Forum on Enterprise and the Environment, sponsored by The Times.

He said future generations would put one of two questions to today’s adults.

“It will either be ‘What were you thinking, didn’t you see the North Pole melting before your eyes, didn’t you hear what the scientists were saying?’.

Or they will ask

‘How is it you were able to find the moral courage to solve the crisis which so many said couldn’t be solved?’”

Interestingly enough, Al gore along with David Blood started Generation Investment Management. A company that Gore buys his carbon credits from.

Al Gore, self appointed expert on global warming has been purchasing carbon credits in an effort to offset his palatial lifestyle. What he didn’t tell us, however, is that the company he is buying the credits from is actually owned by him. Ching, ching … more

Another interesting point is David Blood, who brings to the table significant experience in traditional investing as former CEO of Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

Generation has made a legally binding commitment to measure and report its annual business-related emissions. They are legally required to purchase Carbon Financial Instruments (CFIs) sufficient to offset all emissions from electricity use, commuting, and business travel on an annual basis. Our compliance is audited and reviewed annually by regulators from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). …. link

If you have never heard about the Chicago Climate Exchange, it’s the model for a stock market, but for “green” industry. Where company’s can buy and trade carbon credits. If you check out their home page you can read all about tradable Carbon Financial Instruments. My opinion is this will be the next “bubble” for our economy. Which is why Obama and the congress are pushing so hard to push their cap and trade bill.

Guess who would oversee the carbon offsets, the Chicago Climate Exchange. Guess who helped fund them, Obama. And Guess who’s an Associate Member of the Chicago Climate Exchange, Generation Investment Management.

We’re suppose to believe these are the environmental patriots? So the guys who stand to make the most money off of green technology happen to be the guys going around the world convincing us if we don’t change our grand-kids will be living on a beach in Kansas because we let the north pole melt.


Get Ready for Eco-Police

May 30, 2009

New York City is getting tough on so called Eco crime. Every day officers dressed in green uniforms patrol the city to make sure no one is breaking environmental laws. Historically focused on hunting and fishing violations in Upstate New York, the force has been around since 1880. Now they moved to the city, where they patrol the streets armed with guns and handcuffs.


The Media is Trying To Make Climate ‘Denial’ a Mental Disorder

March 11, 2009

This story out of the Telegraph “Climate ‘denial’ is now a mental disorder”, is very interesting.

There seems to be a big push to convince us that we have to act now. Even Prince Charles this week said:

Climate change must be tackled before global poverty

I notice that these main stream reports never mentions there are 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global. Some of these scientists are former and current untied nations IPCC scientists. Ann the 31,000 American scientist who have signed the Petition Project.

Or the What about John Colman the founder of the weather channel, saying Global warming is the biggest fraud in history.


Carbon Credit or Indulgence?

November 26, 2008

From the December issue of INC. Magazine, there was an interesting article about “Going Carbon Neutral”.The first line sums up the marketing of going carbon neutral.

“If it were cheap and easy, would you reduce your carbon emissions to zero?”

The whole article is a propaganda piece for carbon “offset” providers. They want you to hire them, so they can estimate how much carbon you offset a year, charge you a small fee. Enough to make you feel like your helping the planet, but not enough to make you feel like your getting robbed.

Most carbon providers take your money and fund some kind of green technology such as solar or wind power. They say it encourages people to reduce the amount of energy they use. I simply don’t think that will work.

2 different issues

But we are dealing with 2 different issues. Individuals who want to reduce their carbon foot print can easily do it without buying carbon credits.

Start recycling, unplug appliance that aren’t in use. reduce how much you consume, take your coffee mug to Startbucks instead of using a paper cup. Make your home more energy efficient.

Big corporations on the other hand would much rather just pay the fee. That way they have a scapegoat for why they haven’t changed their business practices. “Well we are carbon neutral because we buy carbon credits from so and so.”

But it goes against common sense!

If you take 100 flights overseas every year, but buy carbon credits to off set it, your still taking 100 flights a year. You didn’t reduce, reuse or recycle your way to carbon neutral. You took the easy way out.

And that’s what these carbon providers are hoping for. That there are millions of people who will pay to relieve their guilt.

Carbonfund.org even suggest you buy carbon offsets for your friends and family for the holidays and give them the gift of a better future! They reinforce their belief with their slogan:

Reduce what you can, offset what you can’t

Or Terrapass has a whole gift section of green gadgets that will help save the world. I wonder if you order a gift and they ship it to you, if they pay for the carbon offset to ship it too?

It’s so great lets make it mandatory

These companies are lobbying congress and Washington to make carbon credits mandatory. you own a car, now you owe a carbon tax. You want to buy a new washer and dryer, better stick a carbon tax on top of the sticker price to offset the carbon.

You have an older home, oops sorry that’s not as efficient as newer homes, your going to have to make up the difference in carbon offsets.

I’m not against people reducing, reusing, and recycling,we all should be. People should examine their lifestyles and make some changes. We have lived without consequences for too long, and we need to replace our short term outlook with a long term vision.

What I am against is corporations making huge profits off of selling snake oil, by duping their customers with slick presentations, psychological babble about how they are saving the earth and providing a future for their grand kids.

Carbon Credits the new indulgence

Buying carbon credits is the same thing as the Catholic Church selling Indulgence’s in the 1500′s. You sin, no problem you just need to buy this little indulgence to limit the consequence of your sin. It didn’t change the fact that you sinned, it didn’t even promise to forgive you, only Jesus could do that. The indulgence was strictly to avoid punishment for your sins.

Say like owning a factor and polluting local rivers for the last 40 years. Or shipping tons of toxic toys across the world. Our letting 5% of the worlds population consume 40% of the worlds resources.

“Oh we shouldn’t do that, well we’re carbon neutral”

It’s a crock. These company’s are profiting off of a think tank’s idea that global warming is man made and killing the earth. Just read the Club of Romes report “The first Global Revolution“, page 75


The Earth Charter Will Become Like The 10 Commandments!

June 18, 2008

“The real goal of the Earth Charter is that it will in fact become like the Ten Commandments.”
— Maurice Strong

If you have never heard of the Earth Charter (Click Here to Download) your not the only one. But there is a global push from the United Nations to give the earth charter the same authority as the 10 commandment. Actually even more, since most contributors to the earth charter see the 10 commandments as outdated. I guess they figure that God isn’t relevant anymore.

It’s part of the whole plan to lead Christians into the new age movement by providing a segue that’s easy to digest. The Earth Charter, consisting of 16 principles, has its roots in the values of the Transformational Movement it’s a paradigm shift from individualism, self-interest and separatiterveness, to unity, wholeness and community.

Sounds spiritual right?

That’s why it’s so easy to be manipulated into this new age pagan religion. They sound good on the surface, but it’s laying the ground work to regulate everything we do. Where we can live, what products we can buy, how we have to act, even if we can reproduce.

Go read their website, it’s super spiritual which is why I guess so many people think it’s not a threat. The Earth Charter and the Extreme environmental movement is all about population control!

www.earthcharter.org

Here’s some other stuff that’s worth reading

AL GORE, THE UNITED NATIONS, AND THE CULT OF GAIA

The Earth Charter and the Ark of the Gaia Covenant


Who Benefits More From Polar Bears Being Endangered?

May 15, 2008

From the AP news article, Polar Bears are listed under The Endangered Species Act. For all of you who are about to sigh with relief, lets discuss why this is a bad decision.

Just because they show you a picture of a Polar Bear cub stranded on a floating sheet of ice doesn’t mean they are endangered. After all Polar Bears have been tracked swimming up to 62 miles continuously, and some up to 200 miles.

They show you those pictures to get you to stop thinking with the left side of your brain that handles logically thinking, and to engage the right side of your brain that does all the emotional thinking.

This is important because it’s the first time that the Endangered Species Act has been used to protect a species threatened by the impacts of global warming. This is a very dangerous standard to set because there is concern that this decision could be used to regulate carbon dioxide in the future.

There are studies from the National Center for Policy Analysis, published in “Environment News” in 2007 that shows Polar Bear populations have risen since the 1970s from 5,000 to about 25,000 at present.

Dr. Mitchell Taylor, Polar Bear Biologist, says there is no need to worry, that 11 out of the 13 populations of polar bears are thriving in the arctic and that slightly warming conditions benefits the bears by providing a better habit to find food.

And the Climate Science: Climate Change and Its Impacts study found that wind patterns have more of an effect of the habit then global warming.

So then why all the hype about polar bears going extinct. The US placing them on the Endangered Species List seems to contradict these stories here and here and here and here and here

And why is the US government setting policy instead of Biologist and Scientist?

By placing the Polar Bear on the Endangered Species List, Government now how has action to do 2 things. 1 regulate Carbon dioxide which could lead to things like carbon taxes. 2 prevents the US from drilling for oil in the arctic, which keeps gas prices high.

So the question has to be asked, who benefits more from Polar Bears being endangered: The Polar Bears or the Government?


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.